What鈥檚 Jewish about Jewish Leadership?
A few years back, I was sitting in a class for prospective leaders of the Jewish community and yawning. Although the class was organized by a prestigious Jewish institution and gathered together an invitation-only group of accomplished men and women from business and the professions, I kept looking at my watch and planning my escape. The problem was not the company; it was the content. Like me, the others present were responsible in their daily lives for managing teams of hundreds of employees with multimillion-dollar budgets. Now we were being lectured about vision statements, strategic plans, metrics, collaborative environments, and the other multitude of concepts that I and the others present had not only long ago absorbed, but utilized everyday in our work. I tuned out, and left immediately after the session, grabbing some great kosher deli on the way out and wondering what our tradition has to add to a generic discussion of leadership.
鈥淛ewish leadership鈥 is one of the most used and abused phrases in contemporary life. An entire cottage industry has arisen to train and educate professional and lay leaders for the Jewish community. 91快活林, the beloved institution where I work and learn, is part of that industry with its tagline 鈥淟earning, Leadership, Vision.鈥 Yet, we should all pause鈥攁dvocates and skeptics alike鈥攖o consider the question: What, if anything, is truly distinctive about Jewish leadership?
This week鈥檚 parashah, Shemot, suggests at least a partial answer. In chapter 3, God commands Moses to assemble the elders of Israel and tell them, 鈥溾業 will take you out of the misery of Egypt . . . to a land flowing with milk and honey.鈥 They will listen to you鈥 (Exod. 3:16鈥18). Moses, however, has his doubts. He responds, 鈥What if they do not believe me and do not listen to me, but say: The Lord did not appear to you?鈥 (Exod. 4:1; emphasis added). God then demonstrates three miracles that Moses can invoke to convince any doubters that 鈥渢he Lord . . . did appear to you鈥 (Exod. 4:5). The first and third miraculous signs are well known, because Moses in fact uses them in Egypt to demonstrate that he is truly God鈥檚 emissary: the transformation of his rod into a snake and the Nile鈥檚 water into blood. It is the second demonstrated miracle, however, that raises the most profound questions:
The Lord said to him further, 鈥淧ut your hand into your bosom.鈥 He put his hand into his bosom; and when he took it out, his hand was encrusted with snowy scales! And He said, 鈥淧ut your hand back into your bosom鈥濃擧e put his hand back into his bosom; and when he took it out of his bosom, there it was again like the rest of his body. (Exod. 4:6鈥7)
Unlike the other two miracles, Moses does not repeat this demonstration of God鈥檚 power in Egypt. More startling, this skin affliction 迟蝉补谤补鈥檃迟 (often mistranslated as 鈥渓eprosy鈥 even though it bears no resemblance to Hansen鈥檚 disease) is usually seen by the Rabbis of the Talmud and the Midrash as a divine punishment for misbehavior鈥攕pecifically, slander. In Numbers 12:1鈥16, for example, Miriam is afflicted with the same skin disease for slandering Moses in connection with his marriage to a Cushite woman. Rabbi Akiva believed that both Aaron and Miriam suffered the same fate (BT Shabbat 97a), and the Midrash makes that point explicitly: 鈥淔or we have found that in the case of Aaron and Miriam who spoke slanderously of Moses that punishment [of 迟蝉补谤补鈥檃迟] overtook them鈥 (Sifra, Metzora 5:7). Another midrashic source cites the case of Gehazi, Elisha鈥檚 servant (2 Kings 5:20鈥27): 鈥淧lagues afflict those who speak slander, as we have seen in the case of Gehazi who spoke slanderously of his master and leprosy clung to him until the day he died鈥 (Avot D鈥橰abbi Natan, version A, chapter 9). According to Resh Lakish, the biblical verse Leviticus 14:2, 鈥渢his shall be the law of the leper [metzora],鈥 should be interpreted as 鈥渢his shall be the law of one who slanders [motzi shem ra; literally, one who brings out an evil name]鈥 (Arachim 15b; Tanhuma, Metzora 1).
Did Moses commit slander? The great modern Bible scholar Umberto Cassuto thought not. To the contrary, Casuto sees Moses鈥檚 willingness to subject himself to this normally incurable disease as demonstrating his courage and readiness to endure whatever is necessary for the fulfillment of his mission (A Commentary on the Book of Exodus, 47). Certainly, those are important attributes for a leader.
But Rashi holds a darker view. He suggests that God inflicted Moses with the dreaded disease, even if only for a short while, because he had committed the terrible sin of slander. Indeed, Rashi ties this miracle to the previous one鈥攖urning the rod into a snake鈥攏oting that Moses 鈥渉ad made the serpent鈥檚 occupation (slander) his own.鈥
Whom did Moses slander? According to Rashi, he slandered his own people, the Children of Israel, for suggesting that they would not believe in his mission. Moses had no faith that the people would have faith. Knowing full well their inadequacies and character flaws, he simply did not believe that they could overcome their environment, even with his divinely supported leadership. They had sunk too low.
Rashi鈥檚 commentary comes to teach us a harsh truth about Jewish leadership: it requires faith in one鈥檚 community. This is no small matter. Communities by their nature tend to disappoint. They can be weighed down by inertia and resistant to change. They sometimes sink to the level of their lowest common denominator, rather than accept the challenge to reach higher. They are often comprised of individuals who prefer to follow the beat of their own drums and not collaborate to form a harmonious symphony. At times, they can be downright unpleasant. It has been observed that Moses loved the Jewish people (Ahavat Yisrael), but he didn鈥檛 like them very much. I鈥檓 sure that Jewish communal leaders sometimes feel the same way.
But this week鈥檚 parashah tells Jewish leaders that they need to stop complaining about the perceived defects and deficiencies of their communities, and have more faith that鈥攑roperly inspired and led鈥攖hose communities can achieve new heights. In the aftermath of the Pew Research Center report, we have seen articles and blogs from putative academic, professional, and lay leaders who seek to justify why they left Conservative Judaism and their Conservative communities behind. Some cite a lack of ritual observance in their communities, or a lack of commitment to halakhah, or a dearth of community members steeped in traditional Jewish texts. But the message of Parashat Shemot is that Jewish communities, with all their shortcomings, are sacred, and that true Jewish leaders never leave them behind. They only lead them forward.
According to the Talmud, when God afflicts Moses with 迟蝉补谤补鈥檃迟 for losing faith in the community, God rebukes him by saying, 鈥淭hey are believers, the children of believers鈥 (BT Shabbat 97a). Leadership of a sacred community is different from leadership of a business or a political party. A Jewish leader must recognize that his or her leadership takes place within the context of a divine calling and the people鈥檚 response to that calling. The response may be imperfect, but it demands respect and not disparagement. Rabbi Jonathan Sacks expressed this thought beautifully: 鈥淲ho is a leader? To this, the Jewish answer is, one who identifies with his or her people, mindful of their faults, to be sure, but convinced also of their potential greatness and their preciousness in the sight of God鈥 (Covenant & Conversation: Exodus, 33).
Without faith in one鈥檚 community and the community鈥檚 capacity to respond to a sacred calling, there is no 鈥淛ewish鈥 in Jewish leadership.
The publication and distribution of the 91快活林 Commentary are made possible by a generous grant from Rita Dee and Harold (锄鈥漧) Hassenfeld.